Jameson Gouth’s Underwriter Performance | 2019 Q3 Dashboard

Desciption

Source: 2019 Q3

Dashboard: Underwriter Performance | 2019 Q3
This dashboard provides an overview of Jameson Gouth’s underwriting performance in the third quarter of 2019. It includes metrics such as Gross Written Premium, Number of Policies, Cost per Policy, and NILR%. It also provides a comparison of Jameson Gouth’s performance relative to other underwriters.

This dashboard can be used by insurance companies to measure the performance of their underwriters and to identify areas for improvement. It can also be used to compare the performance of different underwriters and to identify best practices.

This dashboard can be beneficial to insurance companies, underwriters, and other stakeholders. Insurance companies can use it to measure and compare the performance of their underwriters, while underwriters can use it to identify areas for improvement. Other stakeholders such as investors, regulators, and customers can use it to gain insights into the performance of the insurance company.

Who Can Use This Dashboard?
– Insurance companies
– Underwriters
– Investors
– Regulators
– Customers

How Can They Benefit?
– Insurance companies can measure and compare the performance of their underwriters.
– Underwriters can identify areas for improvement.
– Investors can gain insights into the performance of the insurance company.
– Regulators can monitor the performance of the insurance company.
– Customers can gain insights into the performance of the insurance company.

Data

INSURANCE | Underwriter Performance | 2019 Q3
Selected Underwriter: Jameson Gouth
x
Gross Written Premium
MEASURES
Gross Written Premium
Number of policies
Cost per policy
NILR%
4000K
3500K
3000K
2500K
2000K
1500K
1000K
500K
OK
0
20
Y
Jameson Gouth
40
60
45/49
Underwriters
performed poorer
in both metrics
80
*Performance relative to selected underwriter
100
Number of policies
4/49
Underwriters
performed better*in
one or both metrics
120
140
160
O
180
#4 GROSS WRITTEN PREMIUM
2.9M
vs PY
0.2M A
6.2M
#6 NUMBER OF POLICIES
42
vs PY
-5 ▼
314
vs PY
30 A
#39 NILR (96)
19.9%
vs PY
-9.1% ▼
m
13
#28 COST PER POLICY
1,789
m
XY
1.3M
maner
2
3
4
5
6
3
4
6
6
7
37
38
39
26
27
28 Jameson Gouth
29 Letitia Denty
30
40
#
Jani Devereu
Carry Butchers
Jameson Gouth
Andres Lawlee
Normie McElvogue
41
Joni Devereu
Normie McElvogue
Andres Lawlee
Jameson Gouth
Tate Nutter
Gun Matuszewski
Nissie Mifflin
Rolando Kettlestring
Nissie Mifflin
Stephanie Danby
Jameson Gouth
Andres Lawlee
Patric Eddisforth
Settings
£3.4M
£3.4M
£2.9M
£1.7M
£1.4M
78
70
42
42
31
307
314
314
317
335
16.4%
18.2%
19.9%
25.3%
26.0%
Designed by: @ellenblackburn | Data